LDS Flow A comprehensive online experience for members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Understanding General Authority Preferences: A Latter-day Saint Perspective
As we approach General Conference, we are again reminded of the importance of listening to our leaders. This gathering is a time for church members to reaffirm their commitment to the covenant path, emphasize the significance of the One True Church, and reflect on the Book of Mormon. However, amidst these truths, there are peculiar preferences and teachings from General Authorities (GAs) that frequently arise.
One such preference, for example, is Dallin H. Oaks’ insistence on taking the sacrament with our right hands. Another noteworthy example might be the ongoing efforts—possibly led by Russell M. Nelson—to encourage us to refer to temples as “houses of the Lord.” Such idiosyncratic preferences can seem trivial, yet they often capture our attention and provoke thought about how they fit into the broader context of gospel principles.
Distinguishing Preferences from Core Teachings
How much effort should we expend trying to differentiate these sometimes idiosyncratic preferences from the heart of the gospel? Personally, I have often found myself wrestling with this question throughout my life. I have frequently heard that we should focus on the core fundamentals of the gospel—elements such as the Two Great Commandments and the Atonement—and not get bogged down in the idiosyncratic preferences of individual GAs. However, this dichotomy often feels ambiguous.
Take, for instance, the directive to use our right hands during the sacrament. Some may argue that this is a matter of personal choice, while others see it as a spiritual guideline worth following. It becomes challenging to discern what constitutes a core gospel teaching and what is merely an expression of individual preference.
Likewise, several cultural and temporal factors influence certain practices. Historically, GAs have had distinct views on issues like facial hair, which seem to fluctuate based on societal norms rather than sacred principles. During the 19th century, many GAs sported large beards, while today, a clean-shaven appearance seems to be favored among church leaders. Similarly, Gordon B. Hinckley’s past directive that women should have a maximum of one ear piercing now appears outdated and inconsequential, especially since it has been removed from the current guidelines.
Changing Perspectives on Major Issues
Moving beyond the more trivial matters, how do we handle larger issues that have seen a shift in GA preferences? For instance, the question of caffeine consumption has evolved over time. Early leaders like Spencer W. Kimball made strong statements against it, but recent interpretations seem to allow for more personal discretion. Is this evolution an indication of changing preferences, or does it signal a deeper understanding of the Word of Wisdom?
Similarly, fluctuations in church teachings about birth control reflect a more lenient approach now compared to past decades. Earlier GAs discouraged its use, often expressing condemnation. Yet, the Handbook has gradually allowed couples to make their own decisions regarding family planning. The nuanced discussion around the priesthood and temple ban also serves as a striking example. Many GAs once insisted it was a perpetual rule, labeling entire populations as irredeemably lesser. Today, these views are reviled by the church community.
One contemporary issue that stirs deep concern among some GAs revolves around individuals who identify as LGBTQ+. Dallin H. Oaks’ expressed desire for these individuals to conform to heteronormative standards raises questions about whether such concerns align with Christ’s central message of love and compassion.
The Challenge of General Authority Teachings
What becomes increasingly clear is the difficulty in distinguishing between individual preferences and core gospel truths as expressed by GAs. There seems to be a disconnect where leaders take positions on various subjects, believing each is worth expounding upon. For instance, Bruce R. McConkie’s expansive and sometimes controversial book, Mormon Doctrine, touches on an array of topics without solidifying a clear distinction between doctrine and personal opinion.
The concept of “practical infallibility” further complicates matters. Ezra Taft Benson’s Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet suggested that leaders need not possess any formal training to discuss various subjects, effectively granting them authority to speak on many issues without qualification. This belief has fostered an environment where GAs feel empowered to share opinions, sometimes blurring the lines between personal biases and divinely inspired teachings.
“The prophet is not required to have any particular earthly training or credentials to speak on any subject or act on any matter at any time.” — Ezra Taft Benson
While it’s important to respect the experiences of those who have served in leadership for many years, we must critically assess the teachings we receive in light of doctrinal truths.
Navigating Church Teachings as Modern Latter-day Saints
As members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, we find ourselves grappling with the influence of GA preferences. These preferences often shape our experiences, beliefs, and community practices. For years, preferences have dictated everything from sacrament meeting customs to the roles of women in the church. This ultimately leads to the question: to what extent do GA preferences shape our understanding of the gospel?
It is important to embrace the essentials—Jesus Christ as our Savior, adherence to the principle of the covenant path, and commitment to the spirit of the law, which fosters love and service.
In examining the roles of GAs in our lives, we should appreciate their insights, but also be discerning. Recognizing that GAs express personal preferences, sometimes absent of divine inspiration, empowers us to critically analyze and apply their teachings in light of eternal truths.
We are urged to rely on both personal revelation and the scriptures. A verse from the Book of Mormon reminds us:
“And now, behold, my beloved brethren, this is the way; and there is none other way nor name given under heaven whereby man can be saved in the kingdom of God. And now, behold, this is the doctrine of Christ, and the only and true doctrine of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, which is one God, without end. Amen.” — 2 Nephi 31:21
In conclusion, as we prepare for General Conference, let us focus on the vital teachings of the gospel while being aware of the personal preferences of our leaders. We must remain faithful Latter-day Saints, navigating these complexities with an eye toward the enduring truths of the Gospel.
